yea i dunno about that

Kinja'd!!! "OPPOsaurus WRX" (opposaurus)
12/10/2015 at 13:07 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 10

is that the real cylinder count or is that just how many are opperational

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!


DISCUSSION (10)


Kinja'd!!! RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/10/2015 at 13:11

Kinja'd!!!0

Could be a swap to an old Ford tractor three. Or, y’know, not.


Kinja'd!!! Autohaus Derp > RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
12/10/2015 at 13:13

Kinja'd!!!1

Or a 1.0 ecoboost *shudders*


Kinja'd!!! Party-vi > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/10/2015 at 13:20

Kinja'd!!!3

“Engine 3.0L V64 Cylinder”

BRUH


Kinja'd!!! Alfalfa > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/10/2015 at 13:23

Kinja'd!!!1

Naw, man. Further down the add it clearly says “3.0 l V64”

Which makes for a displacement of less than 50 ml per individual cylinder.


Kinja'd!!! Urambo Tauro > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/10/2015 at 13:25

Kinja'd!!!0

cylinders: 3 cylinders

Yeah, one under the hood and one at each of the rear wheels.


Kinja'd!!! Dusty Ventures > Autohaus Derp
12/10/2015 at 13:30

Kinja'd!!!0

On the other hand the top spec 1.0 ecoboost is only 5 horsepower short of the Ranger's most powerful 4 cylinder


Kinja'd!!! Patrick Nichols > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/10/2015 at 13:46

Kinja'd!!!0

Maybe they were trying to go for a modern rotary pickup and threw a Mazda 20b 3-rotor wankel in it... because race truck


Kinja'd!!! functionoverfashion > Party-vi
12/10/2015 at 13:47

Kinja'd!!!0

Close relative of the well-known-to-CL-sellers BMW V6 family


Kinja'd!!! 'Wägen, EPA LOL > Party-vi
12/10/2015 at 14:16

Kinja'd!!!0

Came to post this. Was not disappointed.


Kinja'd!!! pip bip - choose Corrour > OPPOsaurus WRX
12/11/2015 at 06:17

Kinja'd!!!0

sounds about right.